October 17, 2021
If worshipping a god from outside of Africa is so self-destructive for the African race, then why is Europe’s worship of a West Asian deity benefiting them?

If worshipping a god from outside of Africa is so self-destructive for the African race, then why is Europe’s worship of a West Asian deity benefiting them?

Secondly, the Jesus character’s mythical date of birth in 0 a.d in Jerusalem places him in a region history proves was a colony of Greece at the time of his birth and had been for over 330 years


Firstly, the bible is 100% clear that the “Hebrews” are not indigenous to the land of Canaan (later called Israel) but came from the north where Noah’s ark landed, which many site as the Caucasus Mountains (the gateway to Europe. Due to this technicality, the Europeans have ample claim that the “Hebrews” (and therefore “Jesus”) are originally from the Caucasus and therefore Europoids.


Secondly, the Jesus character’s mythical date of birth in 0 a.d in Jerusalem places him in a region history proves was a colony of Greece at the time of his birth and had been for over 330 years. As it is a fact that the pre-modern Europeans mixed in and often replace the indigenous population of the lands they colonized, the Europeans have a very strong claim that Jesus would have been heavily mixed with Greek or even mostly Greek in genes.

The claim that the bible says Jesus was bronze with wooly hair is a complete fiction based on poor reading, for the bible is clear that it says his feet GLOWED like freshly melted bronze and that his hair was WHITE as wool, neither of which make reference to race.
Thirdly, the language of Christian Church is not from West Asia but is Greek and Latin. Thus, they are not betraying the power of their language by being Christian. This is completely the opposite of the Black approach to Christianity by making the original sacred words in another race’s language. Unless your church is using Ge’ez as the theological sacred language, you are using Latin or Greek and therefore a traitor to Black language.


Most importantly, while many Blacks “say” Jesus was Black, the words are completely empty of meaning for 99% of all of the images (even in Ethiopia) in Black churches are of a non-Black portrayal of Jesus. A picture is worth a thousand words. Meanwhile, though there are a few token Black images in Europe to placate Black people who don’t understand math, 99% of all the other images are of clearly European images painted in the most massive manner across Europe and their colonies. They are COMMITTED 100% to the image of their Eurasian god as European.


For these reasons, the European’s use of a deity outside of Europe does not prohibit them as it does the African abrahamic who has nearly no commitment to the deification of their own scripture, language, and image.

One thought on “If worshipping a god from outside of Africa is so self-destructive for the African race, then why is Europe’s worship of a West Asian deity benefiting them?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *